On Tue, 2006-03-21 at 10:23 -0800, Waldo Bastian wrote: > So what is the plan here? Do we want to use XDG_DATA_DIRS/autostart instead > of > XDG_CONFIG_DIRS/autostart going forward and clean up the current > interoperability problems caused by existing KDE entries that weren't > expected to be picked up by Gnome? > I vote for this, that is XFG_DATA_DIRS and fix KDE/GNOME bad ones
> If so, what parts of X-KDE-autostart-condition, X-KDE-autostart-phase and > immutability [$i] should be added to the autostart spec? I suggest to leave > the X-KDE-stuff "implementation specific" and just add some clarification to > the spec that recommends the use of OnlyShowIn=KDE if you need to rely on any > of these features. > > Personally I think XDG_CONFIG_DIRS/autostart remains a better choice and > makes > a smoother transition but I'm happy to settle on anything that offers common > autostart functionality and that people can agree on. > what about changing it to XDG_DATA_DIRS/xdg/autostart, and thus help in the transition? -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
