Hi, I propose an idea about arranging a user's files. First, a little background.
Why is it that in Windows/KDE/GNOME/MacOSX etc. there are two directories for user information - the user's home area (or My Documents, etc.) and the Desktop? The separation seems to be historical. Windows has the desktop as an area for application shortcuts, while the documents & settings/home area was recently invented as a place to store personal files on a multi-user system (windows has only been multi-user since 2000, remember). But Windows also allows and has allowed the savings of files and programs to the desktop, thus confusing the issue. The desktop used to be once place on a single-user system - other files could be arranged in directories in the system root. But now with the compartmentalisation of desktop into a user's home area inside of documents & settings etc. etc., things get stupidly complex. Introduce the concepts of having application links in the start menu and the quicklaunch bar, and suddenly it starts to get very ambiguous and confusing. The Linux desktops seemed to follow on from this idea because it was established convention. Anything including files and app launchers could be placed on the desktop. Originally it would seem, Desktop was made a separate directory in the user's home area because early implementations of the 'Computer' icon or 'Network' icon were actual modified launcher files, not as they are today, invisible objects which nautilus/kde/etc. place on the desktop field dynamically. So, in order to not clutter a user's content with meta-icon-launchers and other fluff, there was a line drawn. But we are still left with this pointless separation. Why not have one place only for applications, and one place for a user's files? Applications launched only from a bar, or a menu; and files in the user's home area displayed on the desktop? What is the point of saving files to the desktop so they're easily accessible; but then having to move them into the home directory? 2x organisation for the user, wasting time they could be spending actually using their files. Why have application launchers on the desktop? Once you've launched an app, it takes up the screen, and the desktop is obscured so you can't launch any others. Isn't this why panels and the 'quick launch' bar in windows, and so forth, were invented? Look at the simplicity of the Mac OSX dock, I say. Many users don't understand the separation of desktop and home area, and many windows users save their recent files to the desktop, creating a massively cluttered space. Why not organise this space using meta-data, or an even more interesting paradigm presented here: http://macslow.thepimp.net/?page_id=18 This allows a home users to see all the things they need to, always. No more ferreting around in directory heirarchies, exposed to the meaingless structure of the internal system - just all their stuff, right there, on the desktop. So in short, I move to create a standard which: -makes all content in /home/user available on user's desktop space -does not allow app launchers on the desktop -removes the /home/user/Desktop directory, because it is no longer needed Please give me your suggestions and ideas. -Ben
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
