On Fri 02. Jun - 11:48:03, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Okay, my first post to this list, so I hope I'm aiming in the right
> direction.
> 
> gnome power manager :         org.gnome.PowerManager
> gnome screensaver   :         org.gnome.ScreenSaver
> 
> This should probably be cross desktop and less gnome-y as there's no
> reason another program shouldn't just drop in as a replacement for
> either xfce, kde or just a slim-line gnome replacement.
> 
> The interfaces we have now are attached.
> 
> Comments appreciated.

So I also have a few.

> 
> Richard
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> The GNOME Power Manager DBUS API
> ------------------------------
> 
> This API is currently unstable and is likely to change in the future.
> 
> GNOME Power Manager exposes a DBUS API for programs to obtain
> information about the DPMS state and to change it if required.
> 
> The following constants are used to uniquely refer to the
> PowerManager object when making DBUS method calls:
> 
> DBUS Service:         "org.gnome.PowerManager"
> DBUS Object Path:     "/org/gnome/PowerManager"
> DBUS Interface:               "org.gnome.PowerManager"
> 
> Methods
> =======
> 
>       Name:           Suspend
>       Args:           (none)
>       Returns:        BOOLEAN
>       Description:    This call will attempt to suspend the system.
> 
>       Name:           Hibernate
>       Args:           (none)
>       Returns:        BOOLEAN
>       Description:    This call will attempt to hibernate the system.
> 
>       Name:           Shutdown
>       Args:           (none)
>       Returns:        BOOLEAN
>       Description:    This call will attempt to shutdown the system.

Why do we need this in a power managmenet context. I think all desktop
will provide such a "Shutdown method" via dbus regardless of power
management.

> 
>       Name:           CanSuspend
>       Args:           (none)
>       Returns:        BOOLEAN
>       Description:    This call Finds if the current user in the session
>                       is able to suspend, and has permission to do so.
> 
>       Name:           CanHibernate
>       Args:           (none)
>       Returns:        BOOLEAN
>       Description:    This call Finds if the current user in the session
>                       is able to hibernate, and has permission to do so.

How is this ment to be? Does it just a mirror the corresponding HAL
methods power_management.can_hibernate/suspend? If so, I think we don't
need it. Desktops will have a close connection to Hal anyway to query Hal
itself for this information IMHO.

If the Can{Suspend,Hibernate} methods are not meant to state this, what I
think we need is something like...

        AllowedSuspend and
        AllowedHibernate

which is in plain policy context, which means that you are able to
disable/forbid suspend/hibernate from a system administrator point of
view.

At the moment, the corresponding Hal methods just mirror the content of
/sys/power/state.


> 
>       Name:           setDpmsMode
>       Args:           STRING
>                       value:  on              100%
>                               standby         <80%
>                               suspend         <30W
>                               off             <8W
>       Returns:        (nothing)
>       Description:    DPMS is a standard from the VESA consortium for
>                       managing the power supply of monitors.
>                       This call requests a change in the state of DPMS for
>                       the current screen.
> 
>       Name:           getDpmsMode
>       Args:           (none)
>       Returns:        STRING
>       Descriptions:   Returns the DPMS mode state.
>                       See setDpmsMode().

Do we really need them? We have the X extensions/functions for that.

[...]

Regards,
        Holger
_______________________________________________
xdg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg

Reply via email to