On Tuesday 08 August 2006 04:35, Bastian, Waldo wrote:
> I will propose patches to the spec for review for these issues over the
> course of this week. If there are additional issues that should be
> clarified before the "1.0" release, please speak up now. Goal of the 1.0
> spec is to reflect existing practice by current implementations.
While reading the spec I noticed a problem with the keys from the startup
notification spec ("If true" for a string key which doesn't make sense). It
comes from the spec itself, I have no idea how that managed to slip through,
probably a copy&paste mistake. Additionally I'd like to make the description
of StartupNotify= somewhat more explicit.
--
Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SuSE CR, s.r.o. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Drahobejlova 27 tel: +420 2 9654 2373
190 00 Praha 9 fax: +420 2 9654 2374
Czech Republic http://www.suse.cz/
--- desktop-entry-spec.xml.sav 2006-08-08 13:58:25.000000000 +0200
+++ desktop-entry-spec.xml 2006-08-08 16:58:18.000000000 +0200
@@ -540,8 +540,12 @@
<entry id="key-startupnotify"><varname>StartupNotify</varname></entry>
<entry>
If true, it is KNOWN that the application will send a "remove"
- message when started with the <envar>DESKTOP_LAUNCH_ID</envar> environment variable
- set (see the <ulink url="http://www.freedesktop.org/Standards/startup-notification-spec";>Startup Notification Protocol Specification</ulink> for more details).
+ message when started with the DESKTOP_LAUNCH_ID environment variable set.
+ If false, it is KNOWN that the application does not work
+ with startup notification at all (does not shown any window, breaks
+ even when using StartupWMClass, etc.).
+ If absent, a reasonable handling is up to implementations (assuming false,
+ using StartupWMClass, etc.). (See the <ulink url="http://www.freedesktop.org/Standards/startup-notification-spec";>Startup Notification Protocol Specification</ulink> for more details).
</entry>
<entry>boolean</entry>
<entry>NO</entry>
@@ -551,7 +555,7 @@
<row>
<entry id="key-startupwmclass"><varname>StartupWMClass</varname></entry>
<entry>
- If true, it is KNOWN that the application will map at least one
+ If specified, it is known that the application will map at least one
window with the given string as its WM class or WM name hint (see the <ulink url="http://www.freedesktop.org/Standards/startup-notification-spec";>Startup Notification Protocol Specification</ulink> for more details).
</entry>
<entry>string</entry>
--- startup-notification.txt.sav 2006-02-07 13:48:29.000000000 +0100
+++ startup-notification.txt 2006-08-08 16:58:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -343,10 +343,15 @@ StartupNotify=BOOLEAN
If true, it is KNOWN that the application will send a "remove"
message when started with the DESKTOP_LAUNCH_ID environment variable
set.
+ If false, it is KNOWN that the application does not work
+ with startup notification at all (does not shown any window, breaks
+ even when using StartupWMClass, etc.).
+ If absent, a reasonable handling is up to implementations (assuming false,
+ using StartupWMClass, etc.).
StartupWMClass=STRING
- If true, it is KNOWN that the application will map at least one
+ If specified, it is KNOWN that the application will map at least one
window with the given string as its WM class or WM name hint.
EWMH spec extensions
_______________________________________________
xdg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
