Hi; I've already replied here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2006-August/msg00019.html Here I'll expand a bit on the XDG side of things. On Thu, 2006-08-10 at 14:10 +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote: > So it seems that [1] needs an update, if the new format that Gtk is > using is the one that XDG wants to use as well, which I suppose it is. I've already put the spec on the fd.o wiki: http://freedesktop.org/wiki/Standards_2fdesktop_2dbookmark_2dspec the spec was discussed here on XDG-list last year: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg-list/2005-May/006862.html http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg-list/2005-May/006903.html I tried to get some more input a year later, when the reference implementation was almost done and pending integration in GTK+ 2.9: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg-list/2006-March/007915.html but got no replies (it was at the time of the great discussion about .desktop files exec lines, so it might have been missed). > Also, why doesn't [1] follow the suggestions for file locations as > specified in [2]. Because, as I said on gtk-devel-list, it tried to map existing files; the usage of $HOME might be suboptimal, so I'm more than willing to review it and move the files inside XDG-mandated directories. Ciao, Emmanuele. -- Emmanuele Bassi, E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.net B: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
