Erlend Davidson wrote: >> Windows Explorer was noticeably faster than Thunar and Nautilus. I've >> tested that some time ago with a large image folder (don't remember the >> numbers). >> >> But this is definitely not a problem with launching a separate >> application, since both Thunar and Nautilus handle JPEG thumbnailing >> internally. Maybe it's libjpeg being slower than the Windows equivalent. >> > Can you try convert (i.e. imlib) against libjpeg? > ImageMagick does seem to be very quick.
Imlib uses libjpeg. BTW: I fail to see the problem here. How often do people regenerate thumbnails that +1 or 2 seconds for 40 JPEGs makes a difference? Benedikt _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
