On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:34 +0200, Holger Macht wrote: > On Fri 30. Mar - 13:21:24, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 23:30 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 00:25 +0200, Holger Macht wrote: > > > > People want to disable gnome power manager on usual desktop systems. > > > > > > I would disagree with this quite strongly. g-p-m on a desktop loads > > > hardly any modules at runtime (less CPU and memory use) but still > > > controls DPMS and Inhibit control. > > > > > > Lots of desktops suspend and hibernate. I've never told anyone to > > > disable g-p-m on a desktop on a desktop... > > > > > yeah, and in those that don't suspend or hibernate, you don't realise > > it's there, since it hardly takes any resources and doesn't show any > > icon on the screen. > > > > So, apart from machines with very low resources, I can't think of a good > > reason to want to uninstall g-p-m for a GNOME desktop. And the same goes > > for kpowersave. > > In this regard, g-p-m currently has a big advantage. It's very well > integrated. I'm currently arguing for the KDE people. > we still need to know KDE needs, so, what is not that well integrated in kpowersave that might make people want to uninstall it while using kde? -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
