On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 12:04 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote: > > What about system-level apps that need to inhibit (think daemons)? > They have no session daemon to register to.
Agree, I'm just throwing some ideas into the air. > System-level locking is still needed and it's more suited as it does > not require you to register any foobar callbacks that just return > FALSE, instead you just obtain a lock on a specific HAL device and > free the lock when you're done. Sure, David Zeuthen has written a bit about this. Richard. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
