On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 19:01 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 17:21 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: > > > > (Of course, we haven't defined how locking on org.freedesktop.Hal. > > Device.SystemPowerManagement will work just yet.. but I took it into > > account with the new HAL locking API that went into HEAD earlier this > > week. This is needed not only for this.. but also to make multiple > > session-based PM daemons work for both fast-user-switching and > > multi-seat.) > > So a package updater would get a lock on the interface, which would mean > any subsequent accesses get a PermissionDenied error, which the session > would covey to the user. > > Could you please elaborate on how you want the HAL locking used? Thanks.
Did that on the HAL list already http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/hal/2007-April/007882.html since it's more on-topic there. David _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
