Le lundi 26 mars 2007, à 00:56 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Le samedi 24 mars 2007, à 11:53, Brian J. Tarricone a écrit : > > > I don't think it's needed to specify that field codes, quoting & > > > escaping rules don't apply to TryExec: this part doesn't look > > > ambiguous to me in the spec. But if you feel it's still ambiguous in > > > the spec, then we should fix in some way. > > > > No, you're right. Since only Exec has further explanation of how to > > interpret it and TryExec doesn't, TryExec should be interpreted just > > like any other key of the same string type. Though I would still > > appreciate the addition to the functional interpretation (regarding > > PATH, etc.) you propose above. > > Agree. > Here's the patch for this. Is there any objection to this patch?
Committed. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
