Hi, On 5/11/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Basically we have four desktop ontologies that I know of: > > Strigi: > http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/kdesupport/strigi/src/streamanalyzer/fieldproperties/ > Tracker : > http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/tracker/trunk/data/services/ > Spotlight: > http://developer.apple.com/documentation/Carbon/Reference/MetadataAttributesRef/index.html
The plan with Beagle was always to use existing ontologies where they exist.. of course, we never really got around to doing that, which is why a lot of them that aren't covered by Dublin Core are in the "fixme" namespace. I still think this is probably the way to go, especially if we have a desire to easily transition to or from RDF. Tracker's seems like the closest to this. I haven't been following this thread super closely. Why define these in .desktop-like files rather than in some sort of documented specification? Code is what ultimately will be setting these, so it will have to obey them. Joe _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
