On 5/16/07, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MEETING: > * It was proposed that we had a platform independent libxesam with the core > non-dbus related utilities such as query parsing and query construction. It > was the general consensus that the time wasn't right. It might be good to > have one, but we should wait and reconsider this when the spec was set was > more mature. Toolkit specific libs abstracting away dbus and other evils > should be provided at some point though. > Agreed. I don't see this as a must-have.
> * We reopened the services/types/categories debate, and quickly settled on > the name categories to avoid confusing the word "type" from field types. > Example categories are Video, Audio, Email, Contacts, etc. > Did you guys come up with a full list ? > * It was brought up again whether this category system should be > independent or dependent on the field definitions. Again we where split in > two camps. Strigi/Nepomuk arguing that the fields should be able to only be > defined on certain cats, and Mikkel/jamie on the other side arguing for > simplicity of the spec. > I think it should be dependent on the field definitions. For instance, it doesn't make sense to set Audio.Composer on something that's been categorized as Email. Fabrice _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
