Brian J. Tarricone wrote: > Not to sound flippant or dismissive, but... who cares?
You do sound flippant and dismissive. :-D > It's already how it is, so why make extra work for something that's > purely an implementation detail that end-users won't see anyway? As a retired EE, I have to tell you that your attitude is not conducive to a standards making process. And please note that on KDE that users do see the names of the icons every time they select an icon. > If it's necessary to expand the use of emblem-symbolic-link for other > types of links, this can be noted in the description in the icon > naming spec. This is version 0.8. This means that it is expected that changes will be made before 1.0 is released. I listed two proper ways to do this -- ways that comply with the spec. If you think that the current name is correct, and that my suggestions do not follow the spec, then please comment on that. -- JRT _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
