On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 15:59 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote: > Rodney Dawes wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-08-10 at 13:10 +0200, Stanislav Brabec wrote: > > > Rodney Dawes wrote: > > > > This would also solve the "Accessibility" "issue" that Stanislav brought > > > > up in his mail, wanting a category for "something that provides an > > > > additional service, but isn't a standalone app 'window'". > > > > > > It still does not solve the problem, which secondary category fits the > > > application (Service), which simply "makes desktop more usable". > > > > "makes desktop more usable" is a subjective measurement, in this > > example, not objective. > > I want "Utility;Desktop", not Prettification. Something targeted to > desktop itself.
Want to use it for what? So far nobody has explained what exactly the category needs to be used for. You've just declared a need for a different category. > "Makes desktop more usable" or "application which helps to organize > windows" is maybe a subjective measurement. But please show me to a > correct secondary category for it in the current specs. Tell me what I am trying to describe, and I will describe it. :) > > On top of the secondary categories, we also have the reserved categories > > for Screensaver, TrayIcon, and Applet to use. These probably all fit the > > type of "apps" you want to have a new special Prettification category > > for. > > It is not Screensaver, TrayIcon nor Applet. What isn't? "Desktop Widgets" as used by dashboard/gdesklets/karamba are all applets. They are just "desktop" applets, as opposed to panel, or java applets. -- dobey _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
