That's an excellent point. If you want to, I can add the pages in the wiki. Please let me know which other areas are needed.
Christopher 2007/12/12, Rodney Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > While having a list of icons that are not in the base specification is > great, I don't think we should list icons as a per-desktop thing. The > goal of icon themes, and the naming spec in particular, is that we can > use the same icons on all desktops. > > I would much prefer the addendum specifications to be targeted at more > specific tasks, or goals. For instance, the Device names addendum I've > already started on is to list all the icons for specific devices, so > that we can more accurately represent devices that are connected to the > computer, in the desktops. Some examples of task-based addendum are: > > - Programming > - Graphic Design > - Data Management > - Device Icons > - Audio Production > - Video Production > - Video Game Emulation > > All these represent needs the various desktops have. I think it would be > a waste to have to duplicate these lists over and over for every desktop > out there that gets put on the wiki. So can we please change to using > this method of icon classification? I think it better suits the purposes > of FreeDesktop.org and the Icon Naming specification, as well as what > the goal of this proposed process. > > -- dobey > > > On Wed, 2007-12-12 at 11:27 +0100, Christopher R. Parr wrote: > > Apparently anyone can create pages. See > > > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/icon-naming-spec/desktop-icon-lists?action=show > > > > Christopher > > > > > -- Windows = a 64 bit rewrite for a 32 bit extension to a 16 bit GUI on an 8 bit OS written for a 4 bit architecture by a 2 bit company who can't stand 1 bit of competition. crparr.net, aglug.net, glass-theme.net, forums.glass-theme.net, lila-center.info, forums.lila-center.info, parrix.net
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
