> If this is done users not wanting CrystalSVG icons will get them ONLY > if a HiColor icon does not exist. This is what I, and other users, > expect to happen.
Be careful. You don't speak for this particular user. I agree with your view that CrystalSGV should not be installing in the hicolor space. I believe it may be appropriate for implementations/distributions to add more default themes before hicolor, but I believe they should consider this carefully. Where we disagree is that I strongly believe the specification is correct in requiring that hicolor be the last theme checked. If this is not true, then its no longer the default. It will take just a few release cycles until the theme(s) located behind hicolor become the defacto default. More importantly, as an ISV, I want to install an icon that will only be seen if the distribution hasn't decided to do a "distro theme approriate" icon *in front* of it: I want the distro to have this opportunity. - Joseph Kowalski (speaking only for himself) _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
