Le mardi 01 avril 2008, à 23:30 +0200, Thiago Macieira a écrit : > Dr. Michael J. Chudobiak wrote: > >> You are correct about this. But in my opinion the consequence of this > >> should be another change of the spec. It should be rephrased to say > >> that the empty PNG file should only be created if thumbnail generation > >> failed even though the file was opened successfully. It seems wrong to > >> me to save a failure PNG only because the file cannot be accessed. And > >> it would be relatively easy to change the implementations accordingly. > > > >As a follow-up, Nautilus and gThumb have been patched to skip > >thumbnailing entirely on files with insufficient read permissions, so no > >failed thumbnail is read or written. > > > >Now... is anyone in a position to modify the thumbnailing spec? Or is it > >maintainerless?
Patch? :-) Btw, if anybody has the original docbook document, please send it to me. Else, I'll do some html-to-docbook work... > Can we also get it a decent home, instead of in someone's public_html? I'll work on this. The public_html approach was just a temporary workaround ;-) I really need to take a whole day to clean things for specs. Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list firstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg