Le samedi 17 mai 2008, à 17:03 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit : > However, there's a kind of conflict between the way we handle the header > and the inline elements, and the order of the merge we're supposed to > have: we end with ItemA1 before MenuB. But I can't see any other way to > have a header that "works". If everybody is fine with this, we should > probably document it in the spec.
Actually, it is defined in the spec: "If the inline attribute is "true" the menu that is referenced may be copied into the current menu at the current point instead of being inserted as sub-menu of the current menu." Note the "at the current point". But I think it's wrong, and the behavior proposed in my earlier mail sounds better to me. Opinions? Vincent -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
