On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 23:35 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 11:40 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-10-10 at 11:26 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > > > On Wed, 2008-09-03 at 16:15 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: > > > > > > For nautilus, what I do is queue all the thumbnailable files in the > > > directory for thumbnailing, but then I prioritize the files that are > > > currently visible. So, when you scroll all the newly showed files are > > > pushed to the top of the queue. This seems much better than queueing > > > just the visible files each time you scroll, as then the non-visible > > > icons won't be thumbnailing in the background waiting for you to scroll. > > > > Oh, and while talking about nautilus. I'm not sure this is very > > interesting for us to use. I don't see any advantages with this compared > > to what we already have (its the same, just via dbus), and it seems > > limited in scope compared to what we eventually want (like larger > > previews in a preview pane). > > What I was having in mind for Nautilus was not to be a consumer, but > rather be a provider of the service. > > That way whenever a consumer would ask for a thumbnail, it would be > Nautilus that would fulfill it.
I see what you mean, yeah that could make sense. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
