Hi, members of main desktop projects could also exchange ideas directly when standards cannot be defined. A sort of brainstorming area for desktop standards.
A common mailing list for standard definitions between Gnome/KDE/XFCE/LXDE/other might be an idea... At least, one member of each desktop environment should have a contact with a member of each other project. My 2 cents. :) Manu. PCMan wrote: > Hi all, > I'm lead developer of LXDE, a lightweight desktop environment > following xdg standards. > As everyone on this mailing list knows, current desktop environments > have many long-standing issues > without consensus. All too often someone might have some proposals on > the mailing list, and gets > replies from several people, and then, the discussion just disappears. > The issues are still there. > Otherwise, there might be someone says "If there is no objection, I'll > add XXXX to the spec." > Later, maybe nobody noticed that issue, and the spec was changed silently. > Besides, if the original author of that spec doesn't agree the change, > no matter how many people want it, the spec won't be changed. > This is not a really good way to achieve the goal of xdg. > A more democratic and efficient way is hence needed. > > I propose setting up a voting mechanism for some unresolved issues. > A forum hosted on freedesktop.org or some other places is acceptable. > > For unresolved but critical issues, like naming of some icons in the > icon theme spec, > we can wait a period of time (maybe one week) and let the users > nominate possible options. > Then, a vote can be held, and the users on this mailing list can vote > on those issues. > > If the people joining the vote is too few, the result can be invalid. > Otherwise some unresolved issues can be settled. > > Please consider this. Voting can definitely improve the efficiency of > decision making. > Besides, the result of the vote can be acceptable by most of the developers. > We can know what most developers really want. Since the specs were formed in > a democratic way, most implementers will happily follow them and the > controversies can be minimized. > > If nobody is going to do this, we're willing to set up a forum for it. > _______________________________________________ > xdg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg > > _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
