On Thursday 09 July 2009, David Faure wrote: > So that a given project has a single voice, to avoid the situation where > several people from a given project have contradictory opinions and then
is that seriously an issue? if so, the projects involved have fatal problems and need to revisit themselves before even thinking cooperating with other projects. but let's assume that it is an issue as a worst-case scenario. there's a reason why source code repositories have reversion controls. it's not hard. look at kde with it's WIDE open commit policies. how often have we had to check abuse of that? twice that i can remember. in 10 years. let's not make this more complicated with possible-but-not-realistic issues. -- Aaron J. Seigo humru othro a kohnu se GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43 KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
