I read that part in source code of thunar. The design is clever and Benny is a genius. I, however, prefer the use of desktop entry files instead of xml ones since it's much simple and doesn't require complicated implementations or merging rules. Besides, it's easier to maintain since the readability of xml files sometimes decreases when its size is growing.
A unified way defined with desktop entry spec will be fairly good since the format can be easily understand, maintained, and it's already widely used. On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:43 PM, Jannis Pohlmann<[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:54:03 +0200 > David Faure <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sunday 16 August 2009, Eugene Gorodinsky wrote: >> > As it currently stands nautilus has one way of adding an entry to >> > the right-click menu and konqueror has another (and I'm not sure >> > about other file managers). I believe it would be very beneficial >> > for everyone to have some standard way of accessing the menu (e.g. >> > adding, modifying or deleting an entry). Thus an application could >> > add itself to the file manager's context menu without worrying what >> > filemanager the user is using. >> >> Are you talking about Open With... or (what is in kde called) >> Actions / ...? >> >> The first one is almost-standardized already, since it comes from the >> app-mime associations (except that from what I heard gnome sorts >> alphabetically while kde sorts by user preference). >> >> The second one is indeed not standardized yet. KDE uses the >> previously-standardized (and removed from the spec, but should be >> re-added IMHO) support for actions defined in .desktop files. >> http://techbase.kde.org/Development/Tutorials/Creating_Konqueror_Service_Menus >> Note that even though the "format" is a former standard, the location >> of the files and necessary ServiceTypes entry is not cross-platform. >> But I'm ok with switching that to a different solution (different >> location and/or way to identify the relevant desktop files). I think >> it makes a lot of sense to use the Actions= "former-spec" though. >> >> How do other environments do it? > > Personally, I'd be very happy to have Desktop Actions back. Really. > > In addition to that, Thunar has its own extension for custom actions. It > uses the XML format defined here: > > http://git.xfce.org/xfce/thunar/tree/plugins/thunar-uca/uca.xml.in > > Actions can be defined using filename patterns and/or most popular MIME > types (e.g. text files or image files). Actions usually have a name, > description, icon and a shell command with variable support > (http://git.xfce.org/xfce/thunar/tree/plugins/thunar-uca/README). > > - Jannis > > _______________________________________________ > xdg mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg > > _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
