I must say I am a bit taken aback by your responses here. Dan's mail made me look at the spec for the first time, and I have to say he is entirely right in his criticism. The spec is full of awkward naming (StatusNotifierHost, ServiceRegistered, etc), internally inconsistent (e.g there's a ProtocolVersion property, but the document has no version information that I can find), ignores decades old lessons from X (when you pass on events, _always_ include the timestamp), and it is entirely void of expected behaviors for either side of this protocol.
But instead of addressing these criticisms, you seem to be only interested in selling your abstraction layer philosophy. Not a good sign for reaching a consensus. Matthias _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
