On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 05:33:25PM +0200, Marco Martin wrote: > On Wednesday 19 May 2010, Wolfgang Draxinger wrote: > > And then think about this: > > > > xinit /sbin/ssh -X $REMOTEHOST $START_DESKTOP_SESSION_CMD > > > > or, even just something simple like > > > > ssh -X $REMOTEHOST $SOME_PROGRAM_USING_THE_SYSTRAY > > > > from a running X session. D-BUS won't work here, because SSH doesn't > > tunnel it. Oh yes, SSH could be expanded to implement it. But then > > there's the next problem: What about connecting from a X server/system > > where there's no D-BUS? Yes, those exists, and they're plenty. > > that's why the specification still requires a seamless fallback to the > xembed version > great prospects for those who actually try to take adavantage of x's inherent networking transparency (the price of which one has to pay anyway): crap notifier items or no notifier items. wow. that's progress.
oh, wait, i'm repeating myself ... http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/2009-September/011060.html _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
