On Wed, 10.11.10 01:05, Patryk Zawadzki ([email protected]) wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:01 AM, Lennart Poettering <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Note that XDG_RUNTIME_DIR needs to be implemented in some lower-level > > part of the OS anyway (e.g. on Linux: systemd). > > Why systemd and not for example ConsoleKit - a standard component of a > desktop machine?
If somebody wants to add that to CK then that is fine. However, I do believe the right place for this is actually systemd, since we can safely bind the per-user systemd instance, the dbus user bus, the existance of XDG_RUNTIME_DIR to the kernel cgroup that makes up the session. With all that in place we will have definition of a session that transcends all layers of our stack. Also note that systemd already does a lot of the stuff CK does, and I became CK maintainer precisely for the reason to merge CK's functionality into systemd in one way or another. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
