On vie, 2011-12-02 at 12:26 +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 at 19:21:21 +0000, Peter Brett wrote: > > You also specify "localized strings" in the > > description, which implies that the key SHOULD be translated. However, > > the localestring(s) type only indicates that the key MAY be translated. > > "localizable strings" maybe? The point is that it *can* be translated.
Right, but as that's already implied by "localestring(s)", I don't think it needs to be mentioned explicitly in the description. > If it's abused, that's just a bug like any other, and can be addressed like > any other bug Yeah. Also I think it is in the interest of application developers to have their application show up in results if it makes sense (rather than as often as possible) - false positives are annoying after all, and annoying users is clearly not a common motivation for developers :) Florian _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
