On Mon, 26 Dec 2011 at 21:16:49 -0500, Charles Suprin wrote:
> Since no-one else has brought this up, there are portability
> considerations. There are colons in Windows paths. The ever famous
> c:\. Also old versions of Apple products used to use colons as well
> for directory separators.
I believe XDG_DATA_DIRS and XDG_CONFIG_DIRS specifically target Unix: they're
an attempt to establish conventions for free Unix (Linux, *BSD etc.) analogous
to those that already exist on Windows and Mac OS (as imposed by
Microsoft, Apple respectively).
The GLib accessors for XDG_DATA_DIRS and XDG_CONFIG_DIRS are documented in
terms of "return an appropriate directory for ...", with a note that they
obey the basedir spec *on Unix*. They do something completely different on
Windows, involving the conventional Windows directories
(C:\Users\me\Application Data and so on).
S
_______________________________________________
xdg mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
