Hi, Le lundi 18 juin 2012, à 09:06 -0400, Rodney Dawes a écrit : > No. There used to be similar names in the spec, but were removed as > mail and browser apps are always branded things, and not generic > utilities. And they need to be branded, so the user knows what to expect > from the app. There's no good reason to have generic icons for them.
Hrm, except that epiphany uses a rather generic web-browser icon... I guess you consider this is a bug in epiphany? Also, more importantly, there are several areas where it might make sense to have an icon for a web browser (for instance, in a UI to define the default web browser). Same for the mailer. Cheers, Vincent > Ditën e Mon, 18/06/2012 më 10.29 +0200, Vincent Untz ka shkruar: > > (cc'ing Rodney and Alex, since they are the people who dealt with > > icon-related specs in the past) > > > > Le jeudi 07 juin 2012, à 11:49 +0200, Guido Berhoerster a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > > > is there any reason why there are no standard icon names for a > > > browser and MUA in the XDG Icon Naming Spec? > > > "internet-web-browser"/"web-browser" and "internet-mail" seem to > > > be in use for that already, could these be added to the spec? > > > > Rodney, Alex, is this change fine with you? Can we go ahead and commit > > this to xdg/default-icon-theme? > > > > (I'm happy to get write access to the repo and do it if you want) > > > > Thanks, > > > > Vincent > > > -- Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés. _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
