On Wed, 2013-02-13 at 08:45 +0100, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 06:45:38PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 16:16 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > Resend, as the original mail was never moderated through (the attached > > > patch was too big). > > > > And the draft is now live at: > > http://specifications.freedesktop.org/idle-inhibit-spec/0.1/ > > > ch01.html > "anothe[r]" > "to avoid the idle" -- huh?
Fixed. > ch04.html > "The D-Bus service name is [what?] intentionally," Fixed. > the spec is ridiculously over-structured for its contents. It has the same structure as other specs. It would also not be so over-structured if it included everything I thought should have been in the API, but I guess I'm fighting a losing battle here. > i expect an in-depth discussion of the purpose of this spec in the > preface, specifically addressing *all* questions raised in the mails we > exchanged with lubos. I would have taken this in my stride 2 months ago, when I first re-sent the draft, but now it's really too late. I'm happy to review patches, otherwise it'll have to wait for the next re-visit. Cheers _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
