On Sat, 2013-12-21 at 11:01 +0100, David Faure wrote: > On Monday 02 December 2013 16:05:56 Bastien Nocera wrote: > > But David's original request was for this to work the same way across > > desktops. > > Not really, actually. > > We use a different approach. That's fine. > > My request is that they don't step on each other's toes :) > > Installing a desktop file with x-scheme-handler/http breaks the KDE solution, > so I was hoping to get an agreement on not installing such desktop files. > > But I'm starting to see that this won't happen, so I guess I'll stick to "if > KIO supports a scheme and an app exists for the mimetype x-scheme- > handler/<scheme>, then give priority to KIO". If anyone complains that this > isn't xdg-spec-compliant, I want it to be said already that this is because > the spec doesn't make room for our solution...
That sounds fine by me. Given that I don't agree that it's a good idea to implement it that way, I'd rather it be hidden inside one implementation instead of mandated in the spec :) _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
