Why would this be useful? And what about when none of these are implemented, would that be a problem?
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 00:28:37 +0100 Corentin Noël <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everyone, > Many desktop environments have their own System Settings > applications, but there is no clear way for developers to > call settings from within their applications without > resorting to hardcoding in commands for each and every > Settings app. I propose a new specification that similar > to other scheme handling in Desktop files, through a new > settings:// URI. With this, developers could call on > Settings applications, without resorting to hardcoding, > provided a desktop environment supports it. For example, > an application calling settings://bluetooth would open > Bluetooth settings for a given desktop environment. > > Here is the specification I propose: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N0uqNtVXEFn3cLgNMeN75mP_dpMpCco-7uw5PKow-_Q/edit?usp=sharing > > I'm of course open to changes and feedbacks, > Corentin Noël > elementary OS Developer
pgp8RS0AXwLwf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
