On 27 March 2017 at 22:21, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > On segunda-feira, 27 de março de 2017 13:38:39 PDT Roman Hargrave wrote: >> WRT moving towards flatpak, I realize that some people want that to be the >> direction things go in, but I personally dislike it, as do many others. For >> this reason, I think that there is still merit to working on >> plain-old-userspace API's. > > The flatpak/AppImage/etc. concept is incompatible with the way that Qt > integrates with the system (by way of plugins installed by the system), so at > this time we wholly discourage our users from using those solutions.
Flatpak is not *at all* the same as AppImage, and there's KDE runtime for Flatpak that already includes Qt, and a portal implementation that allows GTK+ applications running under KDE to use a native file selection dialog to open files from the sandbox: https://community.kde.org/Guidelines_and_HOWTOs/Flatpak Ciao, Emmanuele. -- https://www.bassi.io [@] ebassi [@gmail.com] _______________________________________________ xdg mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
