Hi Daniel,
On 30/10/17 10:49, Daniel Stone wrote:
<snip>
Thiago's questions would be good to have an elaborated answer on.
Let me know if Emmet and Tristan's respective explanations leave
anything uncovered.
<snip>
I'd ideally suggest establishing the goals of the SDK in terms of what
it's meant to provide to external users.
Good point. We should emphasize the benefits to users better than I
have. Tristan's point is pertinent here: the benefit is the reduced
overhead from maintaining only one set of metadata.
<snip>
What kind of hardware? Is that something you'd expect from fd.o, or
would you reuse, e.g. flathub and GNOME Continuous? Do you need
hosting, or build machines, or test runners, or ... ?
Setting up a runner for each architecture will be required. I expect
that we can re-use what's already in use, yes, rather than needing to
acquire anything new. Therefore we're not expecting anything from fd.o
to this end.
<snip>
fd.o already has a Code of Conduct here, which we expect all new
projects to abide by:
https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/CodeOfConduct/
Thanks. These notes are just capturing discussions had: we would of
course stick to that Code of Conduct.
If you have any specific input or suggestions, these would be welcome.
Thanks,
Laurence
_______________________________________________
xdg mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xdg
