On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
> Another thing that I want to note regarding this is ejb:bean and
> isOfType. What we do right now for ejbeans is just check for the class
> type and if it's ab ejbean then generate the corresponding element in
> xml files. Now what if you declare a bean abstract and you want a
> concrete bean to implement it and you don't what the base bean to appear
> as a ejbean itself? You can't because it derives from javax.ejb...Bean
> and we don't check for ejb:bean's existence, but I think we should :-)
+1
> For single value tags you can use the former case also, it's shorter for
> ejb:transaction for example. For multi-values you can't and should use
> the later form.
so thats still our preferred usage for single parameter tags... sorry, I
was fairly busy when the whole tag syntax discussion was going on and
didn't pay as much attention as I should have (o:
> For weblogic we have to simply update it to use new tags like ejb:bean.
> For websphere if you could complete it then ok (bnd/ext done, schema
> not), otherwise we can just put the template there but leave it
> undocumented :-)
ok - Minh said he'd have a look at it, so we'll see what happens.
cheers
dim
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
