By default xdoclet puts the generated interfaces in another package than the
source EJB.
This behaviour can be modified for example by @ejb:interface package="..."
and @ejb:home package="...".
I would suggest that xdoclet behaves the other way round: By default put all
files in the same package, and on users request alter the package name.
The rationale on this suggestion: it is almost always more intuitive to tell
a system what to do (alter the package name) than what not to do. To tell
the system what not to do you need to do what it will do without your
intervention, which often leads into trial-and-error play.
What do you think?
____________________________________
Andreas Schildbach
senior software architect and developer
financial media service
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
