Maybe. If the new code proves to be risky/bugy then we'll make a 1.0
branch, otherwise adding a branch isn't needed.
Ara.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dmitri Colebatch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2001 3:20 AM
> To: Ara Abrahamian
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] 1.0.1
>
> I was going to ask yesterday... should we have a 1.0 branch for those
> releases? Especially if you're about to change all the templating
> stuff... I would think this is a good idea
>
> cheers
> dim
>
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote:
>
> > OK guys,
> >
> > I already fixed 2 annoying bugs (NPE in invalidParam..., and
incorrect
> > message when classpath is wrong). Since these 2 bugs are annoying
and
> > might happen frequently I think we should have a 1.0.1 with these 2
> > fixes plus maybe some other fixes ready for weekend or so.
> > I'll be happier to also find missing docs ready for 1.0.1.
> >
> > So:
> > - any more bugs? Please report them asap.
> > - Rickard and Aslak, can you deliver the docs (webwork/jmx, weblogic
> > param descriptions)?
> >
> > Ara.
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> >
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
