yeah makes sense to me. if there's any doubt you could always put a config switch in as well (and have it default to the behaviour you're suggesting)...
cheesr dim On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, [iso-8859-1] Aslak Helles�y wrote: > I'm currently doing some web development using XDoclet and the cactus > testing framework. Cactus is a servlet and it needs to be packaged in the > war with the application I'm testing. > > Consider this scenario: > I have 100 servlets. I'm using XDoclet to generate a huge web.xml. Then I > want to use Cactus. I'll have to maintain a huge servlet-mappings.xml > because the introduction of Cactus results in all mappings from the > @web:servlet-mapping tags being ignored. I'm facing a maintenance nightmare. > > I've written servlets.xml and servlet-mappings.xml that refer to Cactus. The > problem is that when merge files are used, the mappings from the > @web:servlet-mapping tags are left out of the resulting web.xml. The > phenomenon is the same for a lot of other merge points in web_xml.j too > except for the servlet element. I'd like everything to work the same way as > for the servlet element (tags _plus_ merge file). It's only a matter of > moving the start of the XdtMerge blocks. > > Does this make sense? I'll change it if nobody disagrees. > > (I realise that doing it this way would make it impossible to override the > tags in the servlet classes with merge files, but does that really matter?) > > <aslak/> > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
