> > Changes to pretty.settings does affect the "to-beautify-or-not-beatify"
Funny I meant "does not affect" not "does affect"!! > > logic. So if a file is not modified it shouldn't be touched by > > <pretty/>. And I don't have this problem, on win2k and winxp with > > jdk1.3.1. Maybe the way you checked out from cvs is different? And that > > leads to timestamp in cvs control files which are differnt from mine? > > Possibly, though I don't see any settings in WinCvs to do with timestamps. > I'm using '98 rather than 2k/XP. Maybe that handles modified dates etc. > differently. AFAIK xdoclet.Pretty is not different from jrefactory's one. So if pretty.jar worked for you prettyprinter.jar should also and it really should! Anyway Vincent once told me jboss also uses pretty.jar as part of its build :-) Maybe you could download jrefactory's source, put some traces in it and test what's going on there? :o) Ara. _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
