A wise old hermit known only as Ara Abrahamian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> once said:
> > I like it doing this - see the "Generated class comments" thread. In > > there, I was asking for feedback/suggestions for changes to the class > > comments bits that I'm working on (if I can ever persuade > > WinCvs/prettyprinter to let me build the damn thing again). I'll see > > if I > > can add a parameter to make the timestamp optional while I'm at it, so > > it'll cater for us both. > > Andrew, > It's overkill to implement a compare old/new logic. I wasn't planning to, just a switch for whether the @xdoclet-generated line should include the date/time or not. That way, Vincent can leave it out so the files don't change and his CVS repository is tidier, and I can leave it in so that ClearCase doesn't complain that nothing's changed. > I think that's the > only way for preventing the unneeded updates. The regeneration of the files isn't the problem (and as you say, it's hard to prevent anyway), just whether or not the contents have changed when we come to check them in. Andrew. _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
