On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Ara Abrahamian wrote: > 1- I hate web-based forums! Use email please :o)
(o: yep, was just reading through them, and know that the comments there get posted here > 2- You guys forget that we also distribute samples to end users. Then > the released version's script should look at ..\lib while cvs version's > folder structure is different and should look at ..\..\dist\lib for > jars. So current solution works for both and it doesn't harm anyone. > Does it? Whenever you build it just copies to samples too. I'm more than happy with it as is, I just want to close the thing, its been hanging around for a bit now, we need to make a call and stick with it. Andrew, if you're agreeable with leaving it as is, I think we close it. cheers dim > > Ara. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 5:48 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] [ xdoclet-Bugs-471256 ] clean build target > not > > deleting jars > > > > Bugs item #471256, was opened at 2001-10-15 02:53 > > You can respond by visiting: > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=471256&group > _i > > d=31602 > > > > Category: None > > Group: None > > Status: Open > > Resolution: None > > Priority: 1 > > Submitted By: Andrew Stevens (stevensa) > > Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) > > Summary: clean build target not deleting jars > > > > Initial Comment: > > The 'clean' build target isn't cleaning up the > > core/samples/lib directory as well as it might - > > there's a bunch of jar files copied in there by > > the 'jar' target that don't get removed. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > >Comment By: Dmitri Colebatch (dimc) > > Date: 2001-12-05 06:17 > > > > Message: > > Logged In: YES > > user_id=204154 > > > > Ara - have can you make a call on this so we can close it? > > > > cheers > > dim > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Comment By: Aslak Helles�y (rinkrank) > > Date: 2001-10-16 07:08 > > > > Message: > > Logged In: YES > > user_id=49846 > > > > The only reason to copy ANY jars from one place in the > > source tree to another is if we want to distribute the > > samples alone. Unless we want to do that, I suggest we put > > this in the samples' build.xml: > > > > <path id="project.class.path"> > > <!-- include the jboss verifier, struts, etc --> > > <fileset dir="${basedir}/lib"> > > <include name="*.jar"/> > > </fileset> > > <!-- include the libs that xdoclet relies on runtime --> > > <fileset dir="${basedir}/../../lib"> > > <include name="*.jar"/> > > </fileset> > > <!-- include xdoclet itself --> > > <fileset dir="${basedir}../dist/lib"> > > <include name="*.jar"/> > > </fileset> > > </path> > > > > Why copy-paste-delete anything at all? Just let the jars > > sit where they are (!) > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Comment By: Andrew Stevens (stevensa) > > Date: 2001-10-16 06:21 > > > > Message: > > Logged In: YES > > user_id=247081 > > > > No problem, the samples' own 'prepare' target could copy > > down the extra jars they need (after all, isn't that what > > it's there for?), and then the 'clean' target can delete > > them again. More self-contained than doing the copying in > > the 'jar' target of core/script/build.xml and leaving > > unused copies of ejb20.jar lying around... > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Comment By: Aslak Helles�y (rinkrank) > > Date: 2001-10-15 03:56 > > > > Message: > > Logged In: YES > > user_id=49846 > > > > In my opinion there is no need to copy the jars in the > > first place. Why not just refer to the original jars in the > > classpath? > > > > 1) Don't have xdoclet/core/scripts/build.xml/jar copy the > > jars > > 2) Let xdoclet/core/samples/scripts/build.xml use jars from > > xdoclet/lib (as well as the special ones in > > xdoclet/core/samples/lib) > > > > <aslak/> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Comment By: Konstantin Pribluda (ko5tik) > > Date: 2001-10-15 03:35 > > > > Message: > > Logged In: YES > > user_id=91100 > > > > Not sure this is a good idea. Shall cleaning of > > "xdoclet" affect compiling of examples? > > > > I think not. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > You can respond by visiting: > > > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=471256&group > _i > > d=31602 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
