Hi guys, How are we going to handle the struts thing?
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=485024&group_id=316 02&atid=402704 http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=485601&group_id=316 02&atid=402706 Konstantin Pribluda changed the way the Struts forms are generated. I currently use a 'hacked' version of XDoclet at work to generate the correct forms because it breaks compability with XDoclet 1.0.1. There are two discussion points: 1. What is the name of the struts (what is generated in @struts:form name="..." for use in struts-config.xml). Previously, it was the full name of the EJB. Konstantin changed this by allowing to specify different forms for each EJB. So the name became <ejbName>.<strutsFormName>. This can be a logical approach, but it requires additional work and a change in naming scheme (this could be an option for the subtask?). 2. The name of the generated class. Should this be in the form <ejbName><strutsFormName>Form? For example if you have a RegistrationBean, this will generate you a RegistrationFullForm and RegistrationNameAndFirstNameForm. IMHO this is not needed. In all projects I use struts, I never had different forms for one single EJB (EJB's should be fine grained, as the EJB 2.0 spec suggests). Solution: accept the changes, but implement defaults coherent with XDoclet 1.0.1. What do you think? Kind regards, Mathias Bogaert _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
