Dan,

As I've said in a previous email we'll be happy to commit your
jrun-specific or generic stuff into xdoclet. I'm sure we'll see
macromedia's contribution.

What you've done to run xdoclet using an mbean is interesting, although
I personally prefer to .ear it myself and deploy :-) It gives a more
realistic feel of the end result.

Cheers,
Ara.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Dan Schaffer
> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:59 AM
> To: 'Ara Abrahamian'; 'Andrew Stevens'; xdoclet-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] RE: JRun 4 support
> 
> I just got on the xdoclet mailing list list today.  I'm a qa engineer
on
> the JRun team at Macromedia.   I'll explain what I know about the JRun
4
> xdoclet integration and offer my help to the xdoclet project.
> 
> We don't have any Xdoclet tags specific for JRun yet.  We hope to
> contribute @tags to generate two JRun 4.0 specific files.  They are
jrun-
> ejb-jar.xml and jrun-web.xml.   I have the dtd's and they can also be
> extracted from a jar file in the beta.  I believe all other
configuration
> adheres to the J2EE 1.3 standard files.
> 
> I'll try to describe the integration.  JRun 4.0 is jmx based so we
wrote
> an Mbean interface and implementation class for an xdoclet jmx
service.
> The one class and one interface is the only customization work that
has
> been done.  Doesn't really make sense to put this code into xdoclet
> because it is probably no use outside JRun.  In the jmx service
service
> you configure a working directory.  The service looks for files in the
> working directory containing xdoclet tags.   When the file is modified
ant
> is automatically called within JRun to call the xdoclet target.  This
is
> cool when used in conjunction with an auto deploy feature.  When you
save
> the xdoclet formatted source, the projects is automatically rebuilt
and
> redeployed.
> 
> It's unfortunate there hasn't been more communication from our team to
let
> you know what we've been up to.  We all have been really busy getting
the
> beta out and preparing for the next beta.  I'm just getting up to
speed
> with xdoclet but I hope to help out and write/contribute jrun tags.
> 
> Dan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ara Abrahamian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 11:46 AM
> To: 'Andrew Stevens'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] RE: [Xdoclet-user] RE: JRun 4 support
> 
> 
> > >Basically I believe from reading the release notes they've written
> > Xdoclet
> > >tags etc for JRun 4.
> >
> > My lips are sealed (but check out pages 61 & 214 in the JRun
> Programmer's
> > Guide).
> 
> That's good, and that's good that they do it themselves. Anyway it all
> depends on their strategy whether they want to contribute it to
> xdoclet's core or not. We'll happily host their @tags if they want :o)
> 
> Cheers,
> Ara.
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to