> It's also in the process of being adopted by a few other projects. We
> haven't
> integrated it fully yet and are waiting on some performance
improvements
> that
> Eriks said were coming our way soon (ie don't javadoc if don't need
to) -
> yay.

To tackle those performance issues atm you can make the projects more
modular and let xdoclet run on smaller number of files. This way fewer
files have to be loaded by javadoc. Btw, right now I'm working on lazy
loading/scanning of sources :-)

> xdoclet is great and think it is in a similar position to ant was
about 3
> years ago. If enough people know about it and start using it I think
it
> will
> become the next ant/junit (ie tool everyone uses).

Yeah definitely. This is the vision we all had when we started xdoclet,
even in old ejbdoclet days. We need a bit more time to turn it into the
third corner of the triangle of development tools (ant,junit,xdoclet)
:o)

Cheers,
Ara.


_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com


_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to