Oh yes, I never catch this was not mandatory
Thanks.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf 
> Of Dmitri Colebatch
> Sent: mardi 5 f�vrier 2002 22:43
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Devel XDoclet
> Subject: Re: [Xdoclet-devel] PersonBean no ejb:bean ?
> 
> 
> isn't it something to do with Person being "abstract"?
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Vincent Harcq" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Devel XDoclet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:25 AM
> Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] PersonBean no ejb:bean ?
> 
> 
> > Is there a good reason why PersonBean have no ejb:bean tag ?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xdoclet-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to