Use ejb:relationship and it'll simulate it. See entity-body.j Btw, it's an inconsistency, we should change the name to ejb:relation not ejb:relationship and wrap it in a ifNotEjb2.
Ara. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel- > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrew Stevens > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 4:01 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] Relations > > Just wondering (since I've got some to do now), what's the "best" way to > handle relations in EJB1.1 (BMP) entity beans? And is it practical to try > and automate it with XDoclet, so that e.g. the bean class is coded as if > for 2.0 CMR, and the templates use the @ejb:relation info or whatever to > take care of the rest, in similar fashion to how they handle persistent > fields? > > > Andrew. > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
