First I'd like to thank those who added me as a committer. A few days ago I submitted a patch to add the then-jboss standard convention of having a static final string named OBJECT_NAME in generated mbean interfaces (standard mbeans). (Thanks Vincent for applying it).
Now we've changed our collective mind again and are now using a factory class to have ObjectName instead of String. Since the factory is jboss-specific I imagine noone wants the standard mbean.j file to include a reference to it. So... Is the best way to deal with this to make a jboss-standard-mbean.j in vendor with this new convention? Should I also write a jboss subtask of jmxDoclet to use this template? I'd kind of like to leave the string OBJECT_NAME in mbean.j for use with jboss 2.4: it seems like a reasonable convention to me in any case. And now for another question... I've wondered about generating dynamic mbeans from annotated code. When I write a dynamic mbean by hand, I put the invoke and metadata methods in the class itself. Is there any way to add code to an existing file and compile the modified file rather than the original? Another possibility is to have the dynamic mbean extend the original class, so if modifying the original file is too hard I could do that instead. Has anyone tried to do this? Thanks David Jencks _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
