Bugs item #514961, was opened at 2002-02-08 11:58
You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=514961&group_id=31602

Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Matt (mpetteys)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Not creating {0}Session beans

Initial Comment:

>From CVS, from yesterday or so..  

I have a stateless session bean like the following..

/**
 *  @ejb:bean name="SecurityService"
 *      type="Stateless"
 *      jndi-name="ejb/SecurityService"
 *      local-jndi-name="ejb/SecurityService"
 *      view-type="both"
 */
abstract public class SecurityServiceBean
    extends BaseBean
    implements SessionBean {

public ACL getUserAccountACL(String userId) throws 
DataRetrievalError, EntityNotFound {
...}

//  etc, etc..

}

That does not generate a {0}Session.java class which 
extends this class and generated a ejb-jar that looks 
like this. 

      <!-- Session Beans -->
      <session id="SecurityService">
         <description><![CDATA[No Description.]]
></description>

         <ejb-name>SecurityService</ejb-name>

         <home>security.SecurityServiceHome</home>
         <remote>security.SecurityService</remote>
         <local-
home>security.SecurityServiceLocalHome</local-home>
         <local>security.SecurityServiceLocal</local>
         <ejb-class>security.SecurityServiceBean</ejb-
class>
         <session-type>Stateless</session-type>
         <transaction-type>Container</transaction-type>

      </session>

Note: how an abstract class is defined in the ejb-
class..  It doesn't look like I am missing anything in 
the tags.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Matt (mpetteys)
Date: 2002-02-15 14:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=258771

sorry..  that was it

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dmitri Colebatch (dimc)
Date: 2002-02-13 05:01

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=204154

You do have the <session /> subtask defined in the 
build.xml dont you?  The session subtask is now optional, 
meaning that you must put it in if you want subclasses of 
your session beans to be generated (like entity beans)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=402704&aid=514961&group_id=31602

_______________________________________________
Xdoclet-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel

Reply via email to