On 2002.02.19 02:23:35 -0500 Ara Abrahamian wrote: > > + It's way better than nothing (probably) > > + It's simple > > - it breaks on many many irrelevant changes > > > > Can we run diff from ant to get a report? > > I was also thinking about it, but it breaks if you clean and then build. ??why, if the comparison standard is in cvs, it won't get removed with clean. > > > What I have been thinking of for a testsuite base involves > > > > an xml comparator (insensitive to formatting, just sensitive to > content). > > I wrote one of these for a different testing purpose, I think it would > be > > easy to use here. > > > > a class examiner that compares the properties of 2 classes to make > sure > > they are the same. > > > > These would be somewhat more complex than running diff on text files, > > however I think it might be worthwhile to avoid sensitivity to > formatting > > changes. > > The best solution. Sure the examiner is written once but the problem is > we have a huge codebase and it'll take a huge amount of time to write > such test suites.
I don't see your point. We'd just check an allegedly OK version of the stuff generated from samples into cvs. When you add a new sample, if you forget to check in a "correct" generation product, you will get a friendly error message. Are you saying writing enough samples is a very large job? david jencks > > Ara. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
