P.S. I just ran javadog on JRefactory's sources. Heaps of warnings. 20 seconds (some 600 classes) Guess what? xjavadoc does it in 4 seconds. D.S
> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24. februar 2002 05:57 > To: Ara Abrahamian > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] RE: grammar > > > Holy shit! > > I implemented the thread/wait/notify stuff last night, and it boosts > performance incredibly! If you use xjavadoc to read only class-level tags > it's now abot 5 times faster than javadog. Here is how it works: > > A new thread is spawned for each source class. XJavaDoc waits until class > level parsing is done. > When the parser thread is done parsing the class level, the thread is > suspended with a wait(), and XJavaDoc is > notified, so it can continue. > > If one of the methods that require class body parsing is called (e.g. > methods()), the parser thread of the class > in question is woken up with a notify, and it parses the rest of the > sources. During this parsing, we're also > waiting to avoid a race condition. > > The parser threads are all daemons, so that the VM can exit even > if they are > still running or suspended. > It was really fun to do some thread programming. I haven't done > much of that > lately. The idea was Ara's (of course). > > The parser is not static anymore, but so what? We finally found the weak > spot, and where to optimize. Now I'm looking forward to > use xjavadoc in xdoclet soon. > > Check out the benchmarks ;-) > > I guess that's enough optimising for now. The rest of the job is: > > 1) Write a proper test suite. Throw away the test classes that > are there and > add some custom written ones and try to break xjavadoc - and fix remaining > bugs. > 2) Put xjavadoc into xdoclet > 3) Pick up Reverse XDoclet and XTags. (Konstantin is already > working on the > gui I think) > > See ya > Aslak > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ara Abrahamian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 23. februar 2002 18:35 > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: RE: grammar > > > > > > I knew it! The wait() trick seems simple, isn't it? > > > > Ara. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 8:44 PM > > > To: Ara Abrahamian > > > Subject: RE: grammar > > > > > > Forget about branching. I'll take a look at it now ;-) > > > > > > Aslak > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________ > > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
