Agree, but I don't have IDEA anymore, so I can't do it ;-). I'll start on the test suite and fix bugs instead.
Aslak > -----Original Message----- > From: Ara Abrahamian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 24. februar 2002 11:02 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Xdoclet-devel] RE: SourceClass not public? > > > Anyway don't you think we should split interfaces and implementations in > different packages? I mean Xblabla should be in xjavadoc but > MethodImpl/etc should be im xjavadoc.impl. > > Ara. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:xdoclet-devel- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 4:27 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Xdoclet-devel] RE: SourceClass not public? > > > > Yes, it is intended that none of the implementaion classes (that's > > basically > > everything, except the Xxxx interfaces/classes) are package private. > We > > don't wan't people to access them, because they can do bad things with > > them. > > Everything should be accessed through the Xxxx interfaces, and no > casting > > should ever be used. > > > > Aslak > > > > > > Konstantin wrote: > > > > Ist it intendet to made SourceClass / AbtractClass > > not public? > > > > > > regards, > > > > ===== > > Konstantin Priblouda ( ko5tik ) Freelance Software developer > > < http://www.pribluda.de > < play java games -> http://www.yook.de > > > < render charts online -> http://www.pribluda.de/povray/ > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games > > http://sports.yahoo.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xdoclet-devel mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel > > _______________________________________________ Xdoclet-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/xdoclet-devel
